So at this very moment my wife and I are watching this guy on TV. His name is Wesley Rowe from the Calvary Bible Church. Dr. Rowe was talking about communion. He talked about Transubstantiationism and Consubstantiationism and how they are wrong. We were cracking up because those are both made up words. Transubstantiation and Consubstantiation are real words and the rest of my rant assumes that he was refering to them not his made-up versions. He argued that Transubstantiation is wrong because it still looks/tastes like bread and wine. Even wikipedia knows what Transubstantiation is, that it still has the accidentals of bread and wine.

He also claimed that the Apostles didn't think that he meant that it was his blood and body because he was standing there holding the blood and wine. I'm not sure how that is an arguement, especially since the Apostles, after the death of Jesus, founded a church that beleives in Transubstantiation. I really liked that he used really bad translations of the bible, and never cited anything in the Bible that said that Jesus didn't mean it was actually him, so I will be able to defeat that (lack of) arguement with only one source:

“Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood you have no life in you” (John 6:53)

This was before the last supper. Some followers left because they thought it was weird. If he didn't mean it litteraly then he could have explained that it was a metaphor, but instead he let them go saying that this is a hard teaching.

Some people……..